Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruno Haible wrote the isnanl replacement. Care to enlighten us how the > ia64 long double is laid out in memory? I'm looking at google results, > such as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-08/msg00589.html as starters.
The problem is that the test is bogus. The position of one of the exponent bits does not say anything about the position of the SNAN bit. For example, the Motorola double extended format has 16 bits of padding between the exponent and the mantissa. Even with out padding there is no requirement that the SNAN bit is adjacent to the exponent. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Bug-m4 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m4
