Hi Sergey, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > Of course not. Sad to say, guimb has been inoperational since > 2009-03-27 and nobody noticed it. This being so, there's no use > trying to fix it in 2.x, so I'd suggest to remove it from the > distribution.
Hrm, too late for that. Fortunately it seems there are not that many `mailutils-guile` users in Debian. > FWIW, in the repo it is rewritten from scratch as a pure Scheme program > (see 273e66dc and commits that follow it) which offers lots of new > functionality. I see. Now that there are ~1.5 years before the wheezy freeze, I might want to start looking into packaging MU 3.0 git snapshots. Can you give us a brief summary of the state of the main branch? When would you think it'd be wise to start testing it in unstable distributions? Thanks! Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ _______________________________________________ Bug-mailutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
