Hi! On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:05:43AM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > > This is an old bug, and I seem to recall I had reported it here before, > > but I can't find it. > > It's been fixed quite some time ago.
Good to know! I figure it's hard, at this point, to track down the commit in an attempt at a 2.2-branch backport? The alternative is to bite the bullet and start working on my promised experimental 3.0 packages. However, since the last 3.0pre release, I've seen a number of big changes, some of which appeared to be interface changes. If I upload a libmailutils3 package to experimental, the API needs to be stable, or I'll have to bump the soname to something ugly like libmailutils3debian$num myself, and I'd really want to avoid that. My plan is to start using a symbols list to track API additions to the libs, and if symbols disappear (or the interface changes) between releases with no soname bump, I'll have a problem. How far are we from an API/ABI freeze? Jordi PS: off-topic, but with last night's upload, mailutils is finally available for the hurd-i386 architecture on the unstable suite, after a way too long series of build failures, all unrelated to mailutils' code. https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mailutils&arch=hurd-i386 OTOH, a new Debian architecture (s390x) has testsuite failures, but I still don't have an idea if this same error is still present in the current git master code: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mailutils&arch=s390x&ver=1%3A2.2%2Bdfsg1-5&stamp=1330644291 S390X is our only big-endian, native 64 bit architecture, so that's probably the main difference between the rest. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-mailutils mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
