"Paul D. Smith" wrote: > You miss the bigger picture.
> [ BIG picture snipped ] > That's not to say that this shouldn't be done: it's actually an absolute > must-have if make is to survive too much into the future: systems are > getting too fast to rely on timestamps anymore. It's on the TODO list > but as I've said there are many considerations. There are a number of > threads dealing with this in the archives of these lists. This is what I wanted to hear. (Since I want to cling to make as long as possible) Thanks, Markus _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
