On 2007-10-13 16:37Z, Paul Smith wrote: > > I'm considering switching from CVS to another form of SCM. Currently, > Savannah supports (in addition to CVS) GNU arch and GIT. If SVN were > supported I'd probably go for that, because (a) it has great support for > alternative OSs like Windows, etc.; and (b) GNU make development is > currently straightforward enough that the advanced features of GIT > (advanced merging and peer-to-peer development) aren't critical. > However, SVN is not an option
Although the FAQ https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhenSvN says SVN isn't available yet, that page was last edited six months ago and seems out of date in light of this post by one of the savannah hackers a month ago: https://savannah.gnu.org/task/index.php?7111#comment3 | savannah offers subversion as beta test (for information, I used it | for 1 month now without any problems). But savannah offers git and | arch too. So you have choice. I'd guess this is the savannah svn repository he's referring to: https://savannah.nongnu.org/svn/?group=scleaner in case anyone wants to see a concrete example. _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
