Tim Murphy wrote: > One small concern that I have with checksums is that it might take a > really long time to check large files or a lot of files.
True. However if you have, say, 100MB of objects then the time to calculate checksums is almost certainly going to be smaller than the time it takes to unnecessarily re-link those 100MB of objects when one source file has trivially changed. In other words, the savings scale with the cost. And the savings have a possibility to scale faster than cost, such as when the checksum proves it unnecessary to rebuild a library that would otherwise have triggered the re-linking of numerous other binaries in the tree. Autoconf for a long time has had a very primitive version of this type of logic with config.h, since nearly every source file in a tree typically depends on config.h. What would be even neater would be if gcc could implement something analogous to what happened with -MD: generate a md5sum as a side effect of compilation. Then make could use that with no overhead, just as it currently possible to use the dependency output of -MD. Brian _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
