The order of generation of any targets that don't have dependencies is not documented. This is deliberate because there is no defined ordering. The targets may even be generated in parallel.
----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: bug-make@gnu.org <bug-make@gnu.org> Sent: Mon Sep 01 05:45:33 2008 Subject: Order of consideration of missing include files is not documented Hi, I noticed that if you include some files in a makefile like include a.d b.d c.d and make knows how to make them, then it firsts generates c.d, then b.d and so on. To me, at least, this reverse order of the include-file-list to generate these files feels counter intuitive. At least it is not documented - if didn't overlook it of course. Best regards Georg Sauthoff -- Fortune : 'Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.' ;) _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make