I'm just another make user. I like the idea - some operating systems have change notification mechanisms. One could use this for a kind of continuous integration - rebuilding files as they are changed or checked in.
Putting make in an internal loop would be pointless - one might as well write the script. It would be really efficient for make to act as a kind of continuously running dependency database, where you could tell it about changes and it would recompute actions. I am not an expert on the source code but I think it is a fairly large change to try to apply to make. Regards, Tim 2009/2/4 Noah Slater <nsla...@gnu.org>: > Hey, > > Is there anyone available to give feedback on my enhancement proposal? > > Thanks, > > -- > Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-make mailing list > Bug-make@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make > -- You could help some brave and decent people to have access to uncensored news by making a donation at: http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/ _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
