Update of bug #27714 (project make): Status: None => Wont Fix Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #10: I'm going to close this as "won't fix" because I don't see any reasonable way to implement it that doesn't involve massive changes to the way make works, and I don't think the capability to have "parallel function expansion" is worth the effort. If you want to invoke shell commands in a recipe you don't have to run $(shell ...)... the _recipe itself_ is run by the shell so why use the shell function? Just put the commands that the shell function would run directly into the recipe. Then they will be passed to the subshell and run in parallel just like the rest of the command script. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27714> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make