Le 3 mai 2011 à 18:04, Paul Smith a écrit : >> I'm confused in understanding why it's rightly confused :/ But maybe >> my confusion is, as Edward pointed out, because I am misled by the >> term "circular dependency", as really, I can't see any here. > > Maybe circular is not the best term; as Edward says maybe a better term > in this case is ambiguous. However the same code checking is used for > circular dependencies so that's the output you get.
Yes, indeed. It's crystal clear with "ambiguous" in mind instead of "circular". _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
