I've done the "external utility" solution and only because we absolutely had no other choice - it's not much fun and can be done much more effectively by make itself.
Regards, Tim On 3 May 2013 14:16, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Paul Smith <[email protected]> > > Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:57:57 -0400 > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > I think having this facility built into make is a win, especially as > > parallel builds become predominant. I would be even more happy about it > > if we can get it to the point where it can be enabled by default, and > > users don't even have to worry about it. > > I think enabling it by default will be a no-brainer if/when we come up > with a way to get it to produce the same output as without -j. IOW, > run a parallel build, but output its results as if it were a > non-parallel build. > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-make mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make > -- You could help some brave and decent people to have access to uncensored news by making a donation at: http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/friends/
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
