> It seems like you want to automatically expand or contract the
> number of jobs that make will run in parallel,

Yes, exactly.

I can not use the parameter "-j" directly for the start of the main
make process in my case so far.


> based on some processing of the recipe.

One of the variables (or make rules) will call the command
"getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN".

The corresponding processes should be efficiently started for
parallel background execution after a serial data preparation
was finished.
I would appreciate if I can avoid the evaluation of additional make
files in a recursive way.

Regards,
Markus

_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Reply via email to