Follow-up Comment #7, bug #51292 (project make):
> If you want a "callback"-like setup you can already do it with eval and
call:
This approach might be an approximation which can work as usual for a while.
> Personally I'm not convinced this is useful in general...
I dared to propose a software extension which can be similar to the
functionality “static pattern rules”.
Under which circumstances can the generic variant move into the standard
functions?
> But if you had one set of global makefiles that defined all the templates,
etc. then used data-driven variable assignments to do the rest I suppose it
might be useful.
Thanks that you can follow in this software design direction.
I imagine that make rule construction can become more dynamic.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51292>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
