Looks a likely match for: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-November/013597.html
Fixed in jdk8u in 2014. Surely our OP is using that already... but he does say jdk8 rather than jdk8u, so maybe not. ________________________________ From: Bug-make <bug-make-bounces+martin.dorey=hds....@gnu.org> on behalf of Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 06:12 To: Preethi Selvaraju; bug-make@gnu.org Subject: Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues ***** EXTERNAL EMAIL ***** On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 08:56 +0000, Preethi Selvaraju wrote: > Error: > /usr/bin/gmake: invalid option -- 8 > /usr/bin/gmake: invalid option -- / > /usr/bin/gmake: invalid option -- a > /usr/bin/gmake: invalid option -- / > /usr/bin/gmake: invalid option -- c This are just the error messages. They mean that the options provided to make are illegal, in some way. We can't do anything to help unless you show us the make command line that was invoked so we can see what it says. Also useful would be the actual recipe from the makefile; the failure was found here: > gmake[5]: *** > [/export/home/preethi/openjdk8/hotspot/make/solaris/makefiles/top.make:84: > ad_stuff] Error 2 So the recipe to build the ad_stuff target in the top.make file at line 84 would be helpful. Well, I can see that these makefiles follow the anti-pattern of adding "@" prefixes to recipe lines: https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhg.openjdk.java.net%2Fjdk8%2Fjdk8%2Fhotspot%2Ffile%2F87ee5ee27509%2Fmake%2Fsolaris%2Fmakefiles%2Ftop.make%23l82&data=01%7C01%7CMartin.Dorey%40hitachivantara.com%7C5f0495e356d14492f2d608d81c2e04b3%7C18791e1761594f52a8d4de814ca8284a%7C0&sdata=cf6PrTx%2B9bD%2BMoo4P%2FXDmyp0Y4wACRm05NMIwXABhFU%3D&reserved=0 If you remove the "@" before the "$(MAKE)" then it will print the command line. It appears that running the "adjust-mflags" script is giving bogus results. Using MFLAGS like this is generally a bad idea and I have no idea what they mean by "Wierd argument adjustment for "gnumake -j..."". It feels like a hack. But my suspicion is that this behavior difference is related to this change in GNU make 4.0: * Behavior of MAKEFLAGS and MFLAGS is more rigorously defined. All simple flags are grouped together in the first word of MAKEFLAGS. No options that accept arguments appear in the first word. If no simple flags are present MAKEFLAGS begins with a space. Flags with both short and long versions always use the short versions in MAKEFLAGS. Flags are listed in alphabetical order using ASCII ordering. MFLAGS never begins with "- ".
