On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:22:42 -0300 Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Håkon Løvdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 9/9/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I hear the devel tree is dead, so mayeb it can fall apart. > > > > I second that. I recently checked out both stable and devel and compared > > them, and stable contained several things not merged to devel (unit, > > some constraint handling, etc). So unless someone is willing to > > do a job and bring devel completely up to date compared to stable > > and has active plans for continuing to use and update devel I would > > recommend not importing it (for now. It can always be imported later if > > needed). > > I think the best is to import it and later remove it. Since we'll > already have all his history important and allow everybody to check > things using it. > Indeed there's absolutly nothing but useless forking changelog informations in devel, that is not already in stable... There used to be some HFS improvement before I merged them in stable, but now devel is just an old stable version (or a mix of old stable versions)... That said, i'm only giving information, and if for any reason somebody really wants devel to be imported in svn that wont make me cry :) Cheers, Guillaume Knispel _______________________________________________ Bug-parted mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
