Petr Uzel wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:58:39PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Here are a few more: >> >> fix typo in comment >> build: use gettext-0.17 >> maint: update helper scripts >> maint: remove useless definitions >> build: update gnulib submodule to latest >> >> From bd5754769fa6435a0166192ca1cca531c500694b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> >> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:29:56 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 03/10] build: use gettext-0.17 >> >> * configure.ac: Use gettext-0.17. >> * bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Use gettext-h, not gettext. >> since the latter drags in a depedency on gettext 0.18. >> --- >> bootstrap.conf | 2 +- >> configure.ac | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/bootstrap.conf b/bootstrap.conf >> index 4ca51a7..9907304 100644 >> --- a/bootstrap.conf >> +++ b/bootstrap.conf >> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ gnulib_modules=" >> dirname >> fdl >> fsync >> - gettext >> + gettext-h >> git-version-gen >> gitlog-to-changelog >> gnu-web-doc-update >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index ceecacf..9ae5783 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ libraries.) >> fi >> AM_PROG_LIBTOOL >> >> -AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.15]) >> +AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18]) > > Shouldn't this be [0.17] ? ^^^^
Good catch. Thanks. That would make it match the log. Would my requiring 0.18 cause trouble for you personally? I'm using gettext-0.18 on all of my development systems, so initially I chose 0.18 there. But then I figured I'd make it easier for people who build from git, changed the log but forgot to change configure.ac. On one hand, gettext-0.18 does have some desirable improvements, and little risk of regression, imho. On the other, I don't want to make it too hard for others to build from git. It has no effect on those who build from a distribution tarball. _______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted