On 3/25/11 2:55 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> The question is whether or not a failure to build the shared version of
>> readline should cause the build to fail, even if the static library is
>> created successfully.
>
> i cant see how ignoring the shared link is sane anymore. what
> reasonable OS doesnt use shared libraries anymore ?
That doesn't have anything to do with it. If I've made a mistake in
shobj-conf or shlib-install, should that kill the build? It's ok if
your answer is "yes," and I'm open to the discussion. I was starting
to come around to your position, as a matter of fact.
> how unreasonable is it really to have the 1 or 2 random people running
> on old pos hardware to pass --disable-shared at configure time ?
>
> or even better, why not just convert to libtool already ? every other
> major project out there has long ago switched to libtool. that would
> detect whether the target supports shared libraries at configure time
> and disable it by default.
I'd advise you to take a look at it before shooting from the hip next
time. The readline build system has always detected supported and
unsupported systems at configure time. It's reasonable to have a
discussion about this, but don't pull bogus arguments out of your ass
to do it.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [email protected] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
_______________________________________________
Bug-readline mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline
