On 2011-07-01 11:35 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > > I did.  According to my changelogs, it was fixed right
> > > after readline-6.2 alpha.
> > 
> > I still see the same behaviour with Debian's libreadline6 6.2-2
> > and bash 4.1-3... Which doesn't seem to depend on any readline
> > package... I must be missing something.
> 
> Make sure that their bash-4.1 links with the system readline.  By default,
> bash uses its own static copy of the readline library.  It's possible to
> configure bash to use an installed readline library, but uncommon.

That explains it, thanks. Guess I'll have to make my own Bash
package or wait for a new upstream release.

-- 
André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/

_______________________________________________
Bug-readline mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline

Reply via email to