Ping?

On 10.04.2014, at 15:53, Max Horn <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> the first patch reformats the shobj-conf code for OS X a bit, and reduces 
> code duplication while hopefully improving readability.
> 
> The second patch then drops the useless "-v" flag (it just causes the linker 
> to prints its version), and then tweaks the compatibility_version to match 
> the current_version.
> 
> The rationale behind this is the following: The purpose of the 
> compatibility_version is to reflect when new ABIs are added. Since readline 
> 6.3 added new ABI compared to 6.2, it should have higher 
> compatibility_version. 
> 
> With this in place, a binary linked against readline 6.2 will work fine with 
> 6.3; but one linked against 6.3 will refuse to run with just readline 6.2 
> present. This is the correct and desired behavior. Without this patch, a 
> binary that relies on 6.3 specific API / ABI extensions could be executed 
> even if only readline 6.2 was installed, leading to unexpected runtime 
> crashes of the binary.
> 
> 
> 
> As a side note: The current_version should always be greater or equal than 
> the compatibility_version; the only reason for those to differ (that I am 
> aware of) is to allow client code to determine the precise version of the 
> loaded shared library, e.g. to determine if it has a patch level that avoids 
> a known bug etc. that is independent of the ABI version.
> 
> However, the patch level is not visible to the build code, so for readline, 
> the compatibility_version and current_version simply are always equal.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Max
> 
> 
> <0001-refactor-shobj-conf-to-improve-readability.patch><0002-drop-useless-v-linker-flag-fix-compatibility_version.patch>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-readline mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Bug-readline mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline

Reply via email to