On 8/31/15 10:43 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> That put aside, these patches were not easy to learn about. I believe it would
> be a better idea to mint a new release of GNU readline (say "6.3.1" or "6.4")
> instead which will have all the necessary patches applied.
Hi. That's always a tricky problem. The authoritative place for
information about a particular piece of GNU software is supposed to be
www.gnu.org/software/<package>.
If you go to www.gnu.org/software/readline, you find links that will
resolve your questions: the distribution is there, all the patches are
there, and there is a link that will always download the current, fully-
patched version.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [email protected] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
_______________________________________________
Bug-readline mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline
