Hi Chet, what do you think about changing the definition of word (as in backward-kill-word) in vi mode to better fit the vi definition (this is taken from vim docs, I'm not sure about POSIX vi):
> A word consists of a sequence of letters, digits and underscores, or a > sequence of other non-blank characters, separated with white space (spaces, > tabs, <EOL>). The main difference is that a vi user would expect "xxx,yyy" to be split into words as: 'xxx' ',' 'yyy' and not: 'xxx,' 'yyy' which I think is emacs take on the matter. I know I can bind <C-w> to something like '<Esc>bdwa', but this definition is far from perfect. Cheers -- Carlos _______________________________________________ Bug-readline mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline
