The first one is different. I reported here:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13936
The upstream glibc and gnulib both fixed this bug.
if (temp[0] == 'W' && temp[1] == ';')
{
char *nameend;
const struct option *p;
const struct option *pfound = NULL;
int exact = 0;
int ambig = 0;
int indfound = 0;
int option_index;
if (longopts == NULL)
goto no_longs;
At 2012-04-03 00:28:31,"Paul Eggert" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 04/02/2012 06:10 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We guarantee (via gnulib) that malloc(0) as used in tar will always
>> return a non-NULL pointer (except on ENOMEM error). We see no reason to
>> change tar to guarantee a non-zero size request.
>
>Both reports seem to fall into this category, as near as I can
>tell from the DTD-free XML.
