Markus Steinborn <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is about creating archives, not about extracting. Currently I cannot
> produce a case where such an ACL is stored in the tar archive. Well, if
> the archive does not contain these trivial ACLs, the extractor can
> decide, so this may help for extracting. But that's not the cause of
> above problems.
I cannot verify this as GNU tar does not compile with ACL support, ... but
>
> Some patch like the following may help:
>
> + (0, errno,
> + _ ("acl_set_file_at: Cannot remove POSIX default ACLs for
> file '%s'"),
There is no "POSIX ACL".
What you refer to is a POSIX draft that was based on the Solaris ACL
implementation that was available since 1992/1993, but this draft was
withdrawn in 1997.
Jörg
--
EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[email protected] (uni)
[email protected] (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
