Thank you.  That reply corrects two things I had wrong, and I would rather say 
so
on the list than leave them standing.

1. "There is no CVE for this root" was wrong, and I will not request one.
   CVE-2026-18082 covers it.  A reserved but unpublished CVE is not visible from
   outside, which is my problem to account for and not yours; the sentence 
should
   have read "no CVE is published for this".

2. "Root" was my own jargon for "this specific defect" -- the desynchronised
   sparse map, as against the typeflag bug in CVE-2026-5704.  I will write 
plainly
   next time.

On severity I have no disagreement.  I made no RCE claim.  What I measured and
reported is narrower: one crafted member makes "tar -tf" and "tar -xf" describe
different archives, and both exit 0 with no message.  Same impact band as
CVE-2026-5704 reads right to me.  The credit belongs to Vahagn Vardanian, as in
my first mail.

One correction I owe separately, to the list rather than to you.  On 31 October 
I
wrote to Paul Eggert directly with "(list copy did not arrive)" in the subject,
because a third-party mail mirror had not picked up my post.  That was a false
negative on my side: the post is in the GNU archive at
bug-tar/2026-10/msg00015.html, with the timestamp I sent it.  If anyone now 
holds
it twice, it is one finding and not two.

That leaves the patch itself with no comment from someone who can merge it.  It
is in the archived message, against master, for whenever a maintainer has time.
No reply is needed on my account.

Apex Security Research
[email protected]


Reply via email to