On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Richard Y. Kim wrote:
> It is still possible that FSF made a mistake in info.el for
> 20.3 and then fixed it in subsequent versions, but I think
> this is highly unlikely.
I looked at the sources of Emacs 20.3, and didn't find any error like
this: it does reuse the old regexp.
> I can't verify this myself since I don't know how to access
> the change history of emacs at FSF. Does FSF provide
> anonymous read-only CVS access to the GNU software?
No, there's no anonymous CVS access to Emacs sources. Even if it were
possible, you would not be able to find the version of info.el used by
Emacs 20.3 because the CVS tree is not tagged when a release is made.
