On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 04:32:13PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote: > > Ordinarily I try very hard to preserve backwards compatibility, but in > this case I don't think it's a problem: a document would both have to > use @FORMAT (very few day) *and* macros (very few do, in any nontrivial > way) *and* rely on macro expansion within the @FORMAT -- I suspect the > intersection of all that is the empty set.
Is it really possible, or wanted? In texi2html (unless I am wrong), @macros (and @value) are not expanded in @FORMAT. As far as I can tell, there is no way to escape macro expansion in @FORMAT, that's why it seemed to me that there should be no macro and value expansion within @FORMAT. -- Pat
