Karl Berry <[email protected]> ha escrit: > It unambiguously indicates the end of the node name. If it > wasn't there, we would also have to consider ) as marking the end of a > node name, that is, ) would not be allowed in node names.
I would not agree. An *unbalanced* ')' surely would not be allowed, but it does not seem such a limitation (in a human-readable text an unbalanced parenthesis is almost always a typo). As for balanced parens, it would not be difficult to handle them, both for an info reader and for makeinfo parser. Of course, all that being said, the following: > Finally, I think such a change would mean changing Info readers, still remains true. Regards, Sergey
