On 6 October 2015 at 03:43, Quinn Grier <quinn.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > In this case, maybe it's best to just document this behavior in the > manual. For what it's worth, I ran into this when playing with some > formatting and was surprised to find some words adjoined in the HTML > output. This was inconsistent with the TeX raw region and I couldn't > find anything about it in the manual, so I reported it here. > > Quinn Grier >
Others will have the same confusion and then go searching through the manual, like you did, unless they're made to be consistent. That's why I think it would be better to change it, unless there's an argument for backwards compatibility. I read through an old thread when the inline raw commands were being implemented; I didn't find any enlightenment on this problem though: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/texinfo-devel/2011-12/msg00031.html
