On Sun, May 21, 2017, at 19:06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > For the record: --vi-keys was modeled after Less more than after vi, > which is why we have g and G there.
Okay, now the plain 'd' and 'u' make sense, and the plain 'e' and 'y'. But I still don't understand why M-n starts a search -- it only /repeats/ a search in both vim and less. The thing is: if M-n hadn't been bound to search in vi mode, it could have been bound to next-node instead, which makes for a single keystroke instead of the double ^xn. M-u and M-p are still free for up-node and prev-node. Those bindings would have made more mnemonic sense, when seen next to M-b, M-e, M-f, M-g, M-t, and M-d. Benno -- http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are
