On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 05:16:44PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 10:58:35PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote: > > > > Bingo. /usr/local/lib/libtexinfo.so.0 is being run. It shouldn't even > > be installed directly in /usr/local/lib. > > I could not find a way to make the libtexinfo and libtexinfoxs libraries > 'internal' only. Maybe use noinst_LTLIBRARIES? I can't remember if I > tried and it did not work or if I did not understand how to do it. Also > it would be good if the -version-info could be removed but I think that > it is needed if the library is not fully internal.
We have a similar situation for TextXS.la, where we delete the installed library in install-data-hook. noinst_LTLIBRARIES didn't work because of a design decision/bug of libtool. > Maybe one day libtexinfo could be a public library, but not for now > and libtexinfoxs should probably never ever be a public library. I agree neither of them should be a public library now.
