On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:11:40PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Yes, I think this makes sense. If there is any more testing we could do > > with real-life manuals this could help to throw up any bugs or > > incompatibilies (maybe you have done this already). > > Yes, I already did it for the contrib/mass_test. But I will do it again, > things may have changed, it was before the embedding of a Perl > interpreter.
I didn't have actually checked with the new C main program implementation, I have added that. I did not find any bug, which is not very surprising, as the same command-line is used for different manuals, and this command-line is already tested in the tta/tests/ such that it is not a such an interesting test for the main program itself. The HTML output is not supposed to be different when conversion functions are called from C or called from Perl through an XS interface. For tests of the main program, the only real way is to have users use the program in different ways and different contexts, I believe. -- Pat
