On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 12:00:31AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 04:20:11PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 01:16:36PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > Yes as I said, I don't think it is worth it: > > Ok, no problem with that. I think that it would be important to have > a comment in printed_representation raw_utf8_output_p explaining the > choice with the kind of idea you say below, such that it is clear that > the limitation is on purpose, and is not something that could be > improved. If somebody sees the code later on it could help. >
I've added a comment, although in general it is often not useful to record decisions like this in comments, as people coming to the code in the future shouldn't feel bound by past decisions.
