On Sat, Mar 07, 2026 at 10:53:00AM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 03:41:41PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > I fully agree. The XML output may have been relevant in the past, but > > now it is not, and if something similar was to be done nowadays, I think > > that it should be done from scratch and be more in line with the current > > tree. Or the SWIG interface should be used instead. I would back up a > > phasing out of the XML (and associated SXML), and migration of the code > > to Example, with removal of --xml option, and removal from the Texinfo > > manual. It could stay in Example for more time, though, > > I'd be happy with this.
What about associated @-commands, such as @xml, @ifxml..., or @inlinefmt argument name? My view is that they should be removed too, it is possible to use @ifcommanddefined if needed. -- Pat
