Micah Cowan wrote:
In currently-released versions of Wget, you're stuck with the trick above.
Ok, that's fine for me.
However, in current development versions, wget --version now produces output like:
Definitely a step in the right direction.
(it might be worthwhile to explicitly have a separate, generic +ssl or +https to explicitly indicate HTTPS support regardless of what implementation is used).
Yes, I second that. An application using wget is probably not interested in what kind of SSL library is used, but mostly whether HTTPS is supported or not.
Martin.
