Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> writes: > that doesn't make sense here. the zlib API has always defined gzFile, and > has > operated on that. it has never utilized gzFile*. the fact that it didn't > warn in the past was due to the zlib API not containing code that'd > implicitly > check it, and the reason it doesn't fail at runtime is that gzFile internally > is basically a pointer. so a pointer to a struct is the same size as a > pointer to a pointer, thus the ABI/generated code is unchanged. > -mike
I have added the changelog entry and pushed it. Cheers, Giuseppe
