On 21/10/14 09:48, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Matthew Atkinson <mutley...@ntlworld.com> writes: > >> On 20/10/14 21:16, Tim Rühsen wrote: >> >>> Since Wget does not explicitly support PUT, we may just care for the POST >>> request. Since servers may reject a POST without Content-Length, we are >>> better >>> off with supplying one. Since PUT (and also PATCH) request 'anticipate' a >>> body, >>> we could also care for these. >>> >>> Matthew, could you also check for 'put and 'patch' request and send an >>> amended >>> version of the patch. FYI, HTTP PATCH request is rfc5789. >> >> Attached > > thanks pushed now! Congratulations on your first contribution to wget. > > Regards, > Giuseppe >
Hi I don't think this ever got pushed. Thanks, Matt
