On Friday 21 November 2014 10:36:58 Tim Ruehsen wrote: > On Friday 21 November 2014 10:12:18 Daniel Stenberg wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Tim Ruehsen wrote: > > > Jakub, since I have no 'unsigned char' system running, could you amend > > > and > > > test the check so that it does not give a compiler warning on 'signed' > > > systems ? > > > > How about always doing the check using unsigned? See attachment. > > Yes, but you don't need ustr. > > If you don't mind, I would apply this > > const unsigned char *p; > for (p = (unsigned char *) str; *p; p++) > > Tim
I pushed it. Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
