On Freitag, 7. Oktober 2016 10:57:38 CEST Dale R. Worley wrote: > Tim Ruehsen <tim.rueh...@gmx.de> writes: > > Here is a less invasive patch for review & discussion. > > > > WDYT ? > > It looks OK to me, but I'm not very familiar with the code. I assume > that it passes all the tests we've written, which covers the cases that > I care about.
Yes, it does. I accidentally pushed the patch today, but if anyone has concerns, it can be reverted at any time. But still, please think about possible side effects. Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
