> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:29:20 +0700 > From: Didik Setiawan <d...@didiksetiawan.com> > > > One way to implement plugins is via libdl (dlopen(), ...), and that is what > > I > > have in mind. That is not perfectly portable, but our first goal will be > > systems that support dlopen(). > > So, should I continue to use dlopen() or there is another better method? In > case > we need more portability.
I'd suggest to use libltdl (part of libtool), which will make these features more portable. Note that the GNU project's practice for plugins is to require that any compatible plugin exports a symbol named plugin_is_GPL_compatible, to signal that it's released under GPL or a compatible license. I think any framework should have the verification of this as its part. Thanks.
