>> * Can this be workarounded with existing WGET versions (prepare >> data manually and use "--body-file" to send "raw" data) ?
> You can, see second answer at > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wget+to+upload+data&t=ffab You mean "https://superuser.com/questions/86043/linux-com mand-line-tool-for-uploading-files-over-http-as-multipart-form-data" ? This looks promising. > But indeed, as Daniel says, curl's support for form-data is much better. > Curl does the form-data encoding for you while for wget you have to do I had read somewhere that CURL would be inferior to WGET so I did not really bother to check it out. > Planned for Wget2. OK, good to know. Thank you.
