Follow-up Comment #7, bug #27687 (project xboard):
> and have the xboard package require that
Local engine isn't actually *required*, as I was corrected in my age-old
assumptions. Otherwise, yes, at least on RPM side you're right.
But that's quite another side of the story, I was wondering whether it's
really neccessary to route people through error messages and FAQ, or just find
something to use (presenting the user with the choice of *locally existing*
engines is ok, maybe if only one item left to choose it could be
auto-chosen).
PS: wrt forking, I understand that it's pretty undesirable, of course.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27687>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-XBoard mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-xboard
