Follow-up Comment #4, bug #27799 (project xboard):
Without guarantees this looks better:
(([Ww](hite)?)|([Bb](lack)?))" "(([Mm]ates)|([Ww][io]n(s)?)).* {
return (int) (ToUpper(yytext[0]) == 'W' ? WhiteWins : BlackWins);
}
(([Ww](hite)?)|([Bb](lack)?))" "(([Mm]ated)|([Ll]os[tes]+)).* {
return (int) (ToUpper(yytext[0]) == 'W' ? BlackWins : WhiteWins);
}
It assumes, that "White mated" means "White got mated" and not "White mated
his opponent". e.g.: at FICS "White checkmated" means white lost.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27799>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-XBoard mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-xboard
