Send buglog mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/buglog
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of buglog digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Openmoko Bug #2174: stable-tracking/16e183d:
jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of function
'jbt6k74_display_onoff' (Openmoko Public Trac)
2. Re: Openmoko Bug #2174: stable-tracking/16e183d:
jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of function
'jbt6k74_display_onoff' (Openmoko Public Trac)
3. Re: Openmoko Bug #2174: stable-tracking/16e183d:
jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of function
'jbt6k74_display_onoff' (Openmoko Public Trac)
4. Re: Openmoko Bug #2174: stable-tracking/16e183d:
jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of function
'jbt6k74_display_onoff' (Openmoko Public Trac)
5. Re: Openmoko Bug #2165: gtk layout differences between 2007.2
and 2008.testing (Openmoko Public Trac)
--- Begin Message ---
#2174: stable-tracking/16e183d: jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of
function 'jbt6k74_display_onoff'
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: lindi | Owner: openmoko-kernel
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: System Software | Version: unspecified
Severity: normal | Keywords:
Haspatch: 0 | Blockedby:
Estimated: | Patchreview:
Blocking: | Reproducible: always
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by andy):
Yes git diff is the only tool I know about for this as well.
Before we changed to having trees with history, you could actually see
stable-tracking head if you scrolled down from andy-tracking head, then
you knew what the additional patchset was. But with the history, that is
hidden and the branches publicly sync by merge patches that are mini git
diffs. I think between the two choices having the history is going to be
generally more useful but your point is fair enough.
I still have that kind of branch here locally, I can publish it in
addition to the history branches but probably it will make some peoples'
heads explode to see two branches for each official one.
For now stable-tracking is just a stake in the ground for a future where
we got everything upstream, I am only building andy-tracking regularly.
--
Ticket URL: <https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/2174#comment:3>
docs.openmoko.org <http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/>
openmoko trac
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
#2174: stable-tracking/16e183d: jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of
function 'jbt6k74_display_onoff'
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: lindi | Owner: openmoko-kernel
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: System Software | Version: unspecified
Severity: normal | Keywords:
Haspatch: 0 | Blockedby:
Estimated: | Patchreview:
Blocking: | Reproducible: always
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by mrmoku):
gitk stable-tracking..andy-tracking -- drivers/video/display
nicely shows all commits between the two branches that touched files in
drivers/video/display.
for git log just put .. between the two revisions:
git log 80f4b57fef5dcffb..9b2a35dd616a9fbe
--
Ticket URL: <https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/2174#comment:4>
docs.openmoko.org <http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/>
openmoko trac
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
#2174: stable-tracking/16e183d: jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of
function 'jbt6k74_display_onoff'
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: lindi | Owner: openmoko-kernel
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: System Software | Version: unspecified
Severity: normal | Keywords:
Haspatch: 0 | Blockedby:
Estimated: | Patchreview:
Blocking: | Reproducible: always
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by lindi):
{{{
git log 80f4b57fef5dcffb..9b2a35dd616a9fbe
}}}
shows 532 commits here, have there really been so many changes?
--
Ticket URL: <https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/2174#comment:5>
docs.openmoko.org <http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/>
openmoko trac
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
#2174: stable-tracking/16e183d: jbt6k74.c:558: error: implicit declaration of
function 'jbt6k74_display_onoff'
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: lindi | Owner: openmoko-kernel
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: System Software | Version: unspecified
Severity: normal | Keywords:
Haspatch: 0 | Blockedby:
Estimated: | Patchreview:
Blocking: | Reproducible: always
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by andy):
80f4b5... was before the change to history I think, it means that it can
have exposed the pop, rebase, push business that actually underlies the
rebasing: maybe that's how we get 532 commits.
Thanks for the tip about gitk mrmoku.
I think if you can deal with the jump over to andy-tracking (it means
taking on Balaji's regulator stuff) then it will be a lot easier going on
since the history stuff is then working for you, there will be only a
linear list of commits on andy-tracking to look at for changes.
--
Ticket URL: <https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/2174#comment:6>
docs.openmoko.org <http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/>
openmoko trac
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
#2165: gtk layout differences between 2007.2 and 2008.testing
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: iknowjoseph | Owner: openmoko-devel
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: unknown | Version: unspecified
Severity: normal | Keywords: gtk, cacao,
Haspatch: 0 | Blockedby:
Estimated: | Patchreview:
Blocking: | Reproducible:
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by zecke):
When you say Gtk+ you actually mean AWT of GNU classpath implemented with
Gtk+? If you want someone else to even consider looking into it you should
create a reduction. The most simple java program exposing the issue (for
every of your issues).
--
Ticket URL: <https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/2165#comment:1>
docs.openmoko.org <http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/>
openmoko trac
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
buglog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/buglog
