On Thu, April 13, 2006 1:15 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :On a faster machine the whole process took considerably > :less time; about 1 minute. But that's still a long pause > :during boot which can give users (especially newbies) an > :uneasy feeling.
> It shouldn't take that long even on a slow machine. It only takes > 10 seconds or so on my test boxes (though those are fast boxes). > Even on a really slow machine it shouldn't take more then 30 seconds > or so. I'm somewhat at a loss. If I recall the original thread correctly, these machines taking a long time were emulated.