Ok,there is maybe something wrong. I download the same file from the same ftpd(windows ftpd). So it is write speed,not read speed. I do the test again: the result as following:
ftp> put src.tar.gz local: src.tar.gz remote: src.tar.gz 227 Entering Passive Mode (10,66,23,79,12,151) 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for src.tar.gz. 100% |****************************************| 94806 KiB 11.21 MiB/s 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. ftp> get src.tar.gz local: src.tar.gz remote: src.tar.gz 227 Entering Passive Mode (10,66,23,79,12,154) 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for src.tar.gz (97081686 Bytes). 100% |****************************************| 94806 KiB 4.11 MiB/s 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. 97081686 bytes received in 00:22 (4.11 MiB/s) Can I say that the hammer fs read speed is normal,but write speed is abnormal? 2008/8/12 YONETANI Tomokazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > YONETANI Tomokazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Ok, I had to confirm something before asking you to do anything: > are you downloading a 100Mbyte from a DragonFly FTP server, and > talking about the difference in the transfer rate between when > the filesystem from which ftpd reads is UFS or HAMMER? (which is > what I assumed) If so, your result below lacks the comparison between > reading from DragonFly UFS and reading from DragonFly HAMMER. Instead, > you're comparing sequential read rate between DragonFly and FreeBSD7. > > _____________________________________________________ > DragonFly issue tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1116> > _____________________________________________________ >
