:<snip> :=46urther analysis suggests that the problem was introduced with OpenBSD's = :rev.=20 :1.539 of pf.c (between OpenBSD 4.1 and 4.2) which means that NetBSD is=20 :vulnerable while DragonflyBSD is probably in the clear. =A0The problem stem= :...
Ok, I'm posting here to close the issue. Rembrandt and I conversed on
IRC. I located the patch OpenBSD applied to pf.c and checked similar
code paths in our own (older) code. We do not appear to be vulnerable.
-Matt
