Bill Hacker wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Well this is rather embarassing. This aint a 64bit processor. I bought >> this thing like half a year after I bought my AMD64 workstation and I had >> assumed (Core Duo) would be 64 bit. >> >> Sorry..... >> > > Odd, that. Just which specific CPU do you have? Mobility-something, > perchance? > > Not only the Core-2, but the earlier Core-D had Intel's '64-bit > extensions' (mostly) cross-licensed from AMD. > > My Core-D happily ran FreeBSD ADM64 (6.2 beta onward). > > Is DFLY that different? > > Bill
None of the Core Duo chips support EM64T. Are you perhaps confusing the
Pentium D with the Core Duo? Also, all Core Duo chips were mobile ones,
save for the Xeon ULV ("Sossaman"), which was for dual-socket servers
(short-lived though, as a couple of months later Woodcrest and friends
(Core 2-based) were released).
--
Thomas E. Spanjaard
[email protected]
[email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
