On Tue, January 12, 2010 12:26 am, Matthew Dillon wrote: > : > :Edward O'Callaghan <[email protected]> added the comment: > : > :Everything is detected on that machine and seems to be working fine, just > :thought I would report the messages, they looked nasty. > : > :Cheers, > :Edward. > > It's ok. What it is doing is probing for a port multiplier. The only > way one can determine if a port multiplier is on the port is to > probe target 15, and of course this will fail if there is no port > multiplier.
Would it make sense to say "no port multiplier found" in that error message? I feel like we've had a number of these "what does this ultimately harmless error message mean?" posts lately.
