On Sun, June 13, 2010 12:41 am, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :>> ./t_ml > :> mlockall: Function not implemented > : > :Is it worth MFC'ing? I have a vague feeling I had talked to someone > about > :this before, but I can't find evidence of it. > > What direction are we talking about? Making it return ENOSYS or > making it return success but otherwise be a NOP ?
Whichever makes it build on 2.6. I don't know which that is. I'm a bit suspicious, because I don't remember pulseaudio breaking on 2.6/x86_64.
