Venkatesh Srinivas <[email protected]> added the comment: Hi,
I just committed 881dac8bcf7f6e26635fa38f071b93347ef92192, which I think solves the problem tuxillo hit. I'd love if people tried it out - last time I thought tmpfs was solved, it wasn't :D. The fix allows the malloc zone for nodes to return NULL when its limit is exhausted or when we are unable to satisfy the malloc (I've seen that on some low-memory systems here); tmpfs_node_init would not survive a NULL node as well, which I just fixed. -- vs _____________________________________________________ DragonFly issue tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1726> _____________________________________________________
